GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon Pro WX 2100
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅815.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 311.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌385.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 35W.
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 170W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 1,871 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 808.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1219 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+808% | 1,871 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+600% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+921% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+46% | 1219 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+2592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 131.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 35W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+87% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 54.7% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 310.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $149-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+310% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Lexa |
| Release | January 12 2021 | June 4 2017 |
| Ranking | #114 | #702 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro WX 2100
