
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+543.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 486.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,642 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅+543.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 486.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,642 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro WX 4150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 4150 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro WX 4150

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 2,642 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 543.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1053 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+543% | 2,642 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+300% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+575% | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+69% | 1053 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+1491% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 109.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 50W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+89% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 8.8% less ($29 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 487.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $300-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+488% | 8.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Baffin |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #114 | #620 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












