
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A8-8650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2263.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 252% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A8-8650
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (719 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon R7 A8-8650
2014Why buy it
- ✅+2263.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 252% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (719 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R7 A8-8650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R7 A8-8650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 8 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R7 A8-8650

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R7 A8-8650
Radeon R7 A8-8650
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 719 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 2263.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+2264% | 719 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+833% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1911% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+115% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 112+367% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+3789% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-8650).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 140% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+317% | 24.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 costs 85.1% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 251.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $49-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+252% | 14.7 |
| Codename | GA106 | Opal |
| Release | January 12 2021 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #114 | #890 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












