G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+750.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 156% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,998 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅+750.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 156% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,998 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 350?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,995 vs 1,998 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 350 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015, 750.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 is about 232.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 750.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 350 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 350 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 350 is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,998 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 350 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
1080p
low	149 FPS	90 FPS
medium	131 FPS	72 FPS
high	118 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	67 FPS
medium	104 FPS	54 FPS
high	92 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	27 FPS
medium	58 FPS	26 FPS
high	39 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 350

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
1080p
low	354 FPS	90 FPS
medium	310 FPS	72 FPS
high	249 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	67 FPS
medium	196 FPS	54 FPS
high	160 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	45 FPS
medium	94 FPS	36 FPS
high	77 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 350

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
1080p
low	765 FPS	90 FPS
medium	612 FPS	72 FPS
high	510 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	67 FPS
medium	432 FPS	54 FPS
high	366 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	45 FPS
medium	298 FPS	36 FPS
high	221 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 350

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
1080p
low	523 FPS	90 FPS
medium	452 FPS	72 FPS
high	383 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	67 FPS
medium	371 FPS	54 FPS
high	298 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	45 FPS
medium	259 FPS	36 FPS
high	225 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 350

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 350

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 350's 1,998 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 750.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score	16,995+751%	1,998
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+40%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+149%	5.12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1777 MHz+78%	1000 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	112	160+43%
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+456%	0.63 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 350 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_0
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	UVD 3.1
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 350
TDP	170W-43%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W	300W-45%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	242mm	168mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	100.0+1393%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. The Radeon R9 350 costs 69.9% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 155.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).