
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 A375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1559.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 147.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 A375
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,024 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon R9 A375
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1559.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 147.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,024 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 A375?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 A375 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 12 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 12 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 A375

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 A375
Radeon R9 A375
The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 A375's 1,024 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1559.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+1560% | 1,024 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+460% | 640 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+92% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 A375 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 140% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+193% | 34.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 85.1% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 147.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $49-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+147% | 20.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Venus |
| Release | January 12 2021 | 2015 |
| Ranking | #114 | #877 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












