
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅937.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 751.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅937.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 751.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
- ❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 M360?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M360 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 11 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 M360

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 M360
Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 M360's 1,819 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 834.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+834% | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+600% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1245% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+92% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+2592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M360 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+312% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M360 costs 8.8% less ($29 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 6.1 (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 747.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $300-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+748% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | Tropo |
| Release | January 12 2021 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #114 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












