G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+244.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 214.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,934 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅+244.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 214.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,934 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 M395?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,995 vs 4,934 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 M395 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015, 244.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 is about 9.7% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 244.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M395 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M395 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M395 is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 4,934 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M395 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	149 FPS	98 FPS
medium	131 FPS	81 FPS
high	118 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	84 FPS
medium	104 FPS	69 FPS
high	92 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	27 FPS
medium	58 FPS	26 FPS
high	39 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 M395

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	354 FPS	89 FPS
medium	310 FPS	61 FPS
high	249 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	51 FPS
medium	196 FPS	29 FPS
high	160 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	17 FPS
medium	94 FPS	11 FPS
high	77 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	6 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 M395

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	765 FPS	222 FPS
medium	612 FPS	178 FPS
high	510 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	167 FPS
medium	432 FPS	133 FPS
high	366 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	111 FPS
medium	298 FPS	89 FPS
high	221 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 M395

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
1080p
low	523 FPS	129 FPS
medium	452 FPS	105 FPS
high	383 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	97 FPS
medium	371 FPS	80 FPS
high	298 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	57 FPS
medium	259 FPS	44 FPS
high	225 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 M395

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 M395

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 M395's 4,934 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 244.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score	16,995+244%	4,934
Architecture	Ampere	GCN
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+100%	1792

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M395 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 104.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s+105%	176 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCE. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	UVD
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	VCE
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 M395
TDP	170W	75W-56%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	100.0+52%	65.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M395 costs 8.8% less ($29 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 215.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).