G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+268.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 627.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌59.2% longer card at 242mm vs 152mm.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 152mm instead of 242mm, a 90mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,609 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
97.3% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅+268.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 627.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 152mm instead of 242mm, a 90mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌59.2% longer card at 242mm vs 152mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,609 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
97.3% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 Nano?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,995 vs 4,609 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 Nano is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015, 268.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is about $320 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 268.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 627.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 Nano still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 Nano is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $649 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Nano Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	149 FPS	116 FPS
medium	131 FPS	99 FPS
high	118 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	93 FPS
medium	104 FPS	78 FPS
high	92 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	33 FPS
medium	58 FPS	30 FPS
high	39 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 Nano

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	354 FPS	207 FPS
medium	310 FPS	166 FPS
high	249 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	156 FPS
medium	196 FPS	124 FPS
high	160 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	98 FPS
medium	94 FPS	80 FPS
high	77 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 Nano

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	765 FPS	207 FPS
medium	612 FPS	166 FPS
high	510 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	156 FPS
medium	432 FPS	124 FPS
high	366 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	104 FPS
medium	298 FPS	83 FPS
high	221 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 Nano

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	523 FPS	196 FPS
medium	452 FPS	164 FPS
high	383 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	137 FPS
medium	371 FPS	117 FPS
high	298 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	82 FPS
medium	259 FPS	68 FPS
high	225 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon R9 Nano

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 Nano

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 4,609 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 268.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	16,995+269%	4,609
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584	4096+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+56%	8.192 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1777 MHz+78%	1000 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	112	256+129%
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+250%	1 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Nano relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Nano) — a 42.2% advantage for the Radeon R9 Nano. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s	512 GB/s+42%
Bus Width	192-bit	4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	UVD 6.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 2.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 152mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	170W-3%	175W
Recommended PSU	550W	550W
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	242mm	152mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	100.0+280%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 49.3% less ($320 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 628.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).