
GeForce RTX 3060

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (112 vs 96).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 112), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 14,909 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 14%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 112 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+14% | 14,909 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 12.99 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2115 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+17% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+17% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+17% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 112+17% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 40.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s+41% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (Ada) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (Ada) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 109.1% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 50W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 298.2+198% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | AD107 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #114 | #155 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














