
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 399.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,995 vs 20,669).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅+21.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌507.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 399.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+21.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,995 vs 20,669).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌507.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 20,669 — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation leads by 21.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) with 112 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 20,669+22% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 6144+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+14% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB | 6 MB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 192+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s+29% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 83.3% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 70W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 295.3+195% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 83.5% less ($1670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 401.9% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-84% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+402% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD104 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #114 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












