
GeForce RTX 3060

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 289.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌21.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 140W.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅51.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅150% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 112).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 170W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌507.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 55.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 112 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 26,498+56% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 8960+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+189% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2055 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 280+150% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB | 8.8 MB+151% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 70+150% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 280+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 20% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 192-bit on the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 432 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 19.4% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 140W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 189.3+89% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 83.5% cheaper ($1670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 288.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-84% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+289% | 13.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | GB203 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #114 | #48 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














