
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

T400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+370.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 157.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅+370.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 157.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($180 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,609 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than T400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is T400 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and T400

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
T400
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the T400's 3,609 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 370.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the T400 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+371% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+833% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1065% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+25% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+367% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+821% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the T400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (T400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the T400's 30W — a 140% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 120.3+20% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the T400 launched at $180. The T400 costs 45.3% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 20.1 (T400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 157.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $180-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+157% | 20.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU117 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #114 | #532 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













