
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $870 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 353.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌264.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $870 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 353.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌264.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Titan X Pascal?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Titan X Pascal still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 154 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Titan X Pascal

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Titan X Pascal's 13,660 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 24.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+24% | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+16% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+16% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+169% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Titan X Pascal relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 33.3% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 480 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-32% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-8% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+83% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 72.6% less ($870 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 353.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-73% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+354% | 11.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP102 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #114 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












