GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce2 MX 100/200
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs GeForce2 MX 100/200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅17338.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1500% higher power demand at 160W vs 10W.
GeForce2 MX 100/200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 160W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce2 MX 100/200
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 579900%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+579900% | 3 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1033% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2667% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+144% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+467% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2971% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce2 MX 100/200 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+71% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+283% | 1.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs None (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 176.5% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 55.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 10W-94% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | — | 64mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 55-31% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+36167% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GP108 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #59 | #657 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and GeForce2 MX 100/200
