
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+285.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID RTX6000-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,514 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023GRID RTX6000-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+285.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,514 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than GRID RTX6000-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID RTX6000-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and GRID RTX6000-8Q

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

GRID RTX6000-8Q
GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the GRID RTX6000-8Q's 4,514 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 285.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID RTX6000-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+285% | 4,514 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+357% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+115% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID RTX6000-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GRID RTX6000-8Q supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the GRID RTX6000-8Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+441% | 20.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #59 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












