
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- β +872.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 17,400).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Iris Plus Graphics 950
Why buy it
- β +872.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,789 vs 17,400).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: older-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Iris Plus Graphics 950?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Plus Graphics 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 20 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Iris Plus Graphics 950

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 1,789 β the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 872.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+873% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+750% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2054% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+154% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 136+325% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W β a 165.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80Β°C vs 85Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80Β°C-6% | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 119.3+10% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












