
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- β +1384.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 17,400).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β +1384.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 17,400).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Iris Pro Graphics 5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Iris Pro Graphics 5200

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 1,172 β the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 1384.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 5 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+1385% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1260% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2772% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+111% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+1100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 136+240% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W β a 136.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+178% | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $150 |
| Codename | AD106 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












