
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+592.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 255W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌59.4% higher power demand at 255W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅+592.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 255W, a 95W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌59.4% higher power demand at 255W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Moore Threads MTT S80?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Moore Threads MTT S80 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 28 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Moore Threads MTT S80

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 2,513 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 592.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+592% | 2,513 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | MUSA |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+6% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+50% | 14.75 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 256+433% |
| TMUs | 136 | 256+88% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Moore Threads MTT S80 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 45.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-37% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+999% | 9.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













