
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1737.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅+1737.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro CX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro CX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Quadro CX

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro CX
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 1737.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+1737% | 947 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+2167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+4672% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+16742% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro CX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro CX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+16742% | 0.19 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+1627% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1999 |
| Codename | AD106 | GT200B |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #59 | #901 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












