
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro M5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+85% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quadro M5000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,406 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Quadro M5000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+85% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,406 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro M5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 106 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Quadro M5000

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Quadro M5000's 9,406 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 85%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+85% | 9,406 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+419% | 4.252 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+144% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M5000) — a 21.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+21% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Quadro M5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+74% | 62.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | AD106 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #59 | #280 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












