
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 2900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2536.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
Radeon HD 2900 XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (660 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon HD 2900 XT
2013Why buy it
- ✅+2536.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (660 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon HD 2900 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 2900 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 7 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon HD 2900 XT

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 2900 XT
Radeon HD 2900 XT
The Radeon HD 2900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 660 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon HD 2900 XT's 660 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 2536.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 2900 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+2536% | 660 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+807% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+3070% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 136+467% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+8500% | 0.05 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 2900 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 2900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2900 XT has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+20% | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs UVD+ (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 2900 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | UVD+ |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD+ |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 2900 XT's 25W — a 145.9% difference. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2900 XT). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 25W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+312% | 26.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | AD106 | Thames |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #883 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












