
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+208.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,637 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅+208.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,637 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 61 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 5,637 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 208.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+209% | 5,637 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+127% | 1920 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 115.2 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) — a 122.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+122% | 115.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 112.7+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | AD106 | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #59 | #537 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












