
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+86.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+86.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 86.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+87% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+318% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+146% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5600M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-11% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 186.5+71% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












