G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅+43.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 210W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,104 vs 17,400).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌31.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 160W.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

2023

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅+43.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 210W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,104 vs 17,400).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌31.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 17,400 vs 12,104 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 43.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 43.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega 56 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM, 12,104 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 56 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	177 FPS	95 FPS
medium	162 FPS	82 FPS
high	142 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	79 FPS
medium	118 FPS	68 FPS
high	101 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	31 FPS
medium	79 FPS	28 FPS
high	66 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	409 FPS	267 FPS
medium	344 FPS	227 FPS
high	280 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	261 FPS	189 FPS
medium	217 FPS	162 FPS
high	180 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	105 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	100 FPS
medium	91 FPS	83 FPS
high	76 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	783 FPS	485 FPS
medium	626 FPS	417 FPS
high	522 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	587 FPS	386 FPS
medium	470 FPS	327 FPS
high	392 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	294 FPS	204 FPS
4K
low	392 FPS	245 FPS
medium	313 FPS	202 FPS
high	261 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	123 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
1080p
low	775 FPS	176 FPS
medium	626 FPS	144 FPS
high	522 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	587 FPS	127 FPS
medium	470 FPS	107 FPS
high	392 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	294 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	374 FPS	73 FPS
medium	313 FPS	61 FPS
high	261 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 56

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro Vega 56

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 12,104 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 43.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
G3D Mark Score	17,400+44%	12,104
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+21%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+146%	8.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+103%	1250 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	224+65%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+389%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 27% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Radeon Pro Vega 56
TDP	160W-24%	210W
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Mobile	Integrated
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	108.8+89%	57.6