
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 190W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 190W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 190W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 190W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7700 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU make more sense than Radeon PRO W7700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 91 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 741 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 644 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 785 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 259 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the Radeon PRO W7700 leads by 32.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400 | 23,062+33% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+42% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2600 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 192+41% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 48+41% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 68.8% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 432 GB/s+69% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 17.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-16% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 121.4+12% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












