
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Radeon R7 250X
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs Radeon R7 250X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs Radeon R7 250X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs Radeon R7 250X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅884.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Radeon R7 250X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU vs Radeon R7 250X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 250X
The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon R7 250X's 2,269 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 666.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+667% | 2,269 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+580% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1714% | 1.216 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+154% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+240% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2587% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R7 250X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 250X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 72 GB/s (Radeon R7 250X) — a 255.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+256% | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R7 250X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+283% | 28.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | AD106 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #59 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














