
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+190% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅+190% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 6,000 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 190%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+190% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+182% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s (Dual)+20% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-20% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+263% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Codename | AD106 | Neptune CF |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #59 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












