
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+856.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,819 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon R9 M360
2015Why buy it
- ✅+856.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,819 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon R9 M360?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M360 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 20 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 11 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon R9 M360

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M360
Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon R9 M360's 1,819 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 856.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+857% | 1,819 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+750% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2229% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+174% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+325% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+3208% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M360 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M360 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M360 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M360) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+348% | 24.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | AD106 | Tropo |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #59 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












