
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+550.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,674 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅+550.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,674 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon RX 550?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 550 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon RX 550

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon RX 550's 2,674 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 550.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+551% | 2,674 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+750% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1722% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+114% | 1183 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+325% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+3208% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 550 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 550 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) — a 128.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+129% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 155mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+103% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Codename | AD106 | Lexa |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #59 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












