
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅24.5% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 135W.
Radeon RX 6700M
2021Why buy it
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 160W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon RX 6700M
2021Why buy it
- ✅24.5% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 160W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 160W vs 135W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon RX 6700M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6700M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 152 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 152 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon RX 6700M

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6700M
Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 13,525 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 28.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+29% | 13,525 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+99% | 11.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+6% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 10 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 320 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 135W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+9% | 100.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












