
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 210W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,026 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅+33.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 210W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,026 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌31.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon RX Vega 56

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 13,026 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 33.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+34% | 13,026 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+21% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+109% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+72% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 224+65% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 60.2% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Bus width: 128-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 410 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 2048-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 27% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-24% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 280mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+75% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | AD106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #59 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












