
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+145.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅+145.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RadeonT 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 77 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RadeonT 780M

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 145.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+145% | 7,098 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+148% | 8.909 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2900 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+183% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+1620% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+183% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 165.7% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 473.2+335% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












