
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅32.7% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅32.7% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 14,923 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 16.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 136 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+17% | 14,923 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+55% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+84% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+19% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136+55% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+54% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+55% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 136+55% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 298.5+174% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












