
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 144), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌39.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 115W.
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (144 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 160W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,848 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (144 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 160W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 144), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌39.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,848 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 571 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 178 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 178 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 15,848 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 9.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 36 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 136 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+10% | 15,848 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+41% | 15.62 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+27% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 144+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 32.7% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 115W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 137.8+27% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












