
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅194.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅194.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 125 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 125 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 11,153 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 56%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 100 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 136 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+56% | 11,153 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 12800+194% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+196% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2550 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 136 | 400+194% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 12.5 MB+191% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 100+194% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 400+194% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+100% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+144% | 44.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












