
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅64.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅112.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 64).
Trade-offs
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅64.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅112.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 64).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 126 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 11,162 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 55.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+56% | 11,162 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+166% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+25% | 2025 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+115% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+113% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 136+113% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+100% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 128.2% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 35W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 318.9+193% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












