
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX A4000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌39.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 115W.
RTX A4000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅17.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 160W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RTX A4000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅17.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 160W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌39.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RTX A4000 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4000 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 416 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 166 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 71 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RTX A4000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile
The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 14,782 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 17.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 40 (RTX A4000 Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+18% | 14,782 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 5120+18% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+28% | 17.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+51% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 5 MB+16% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 40+18% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 160+18% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 115W — a 32.7% difference. The RTX A4000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 115W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 128.5+18% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












