
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅32.1% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,400 vs 21,094).
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅+21.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅64.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅32.1% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+21.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅64.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,400 vs 21,094).
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than RTX A4500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and RTX A4500

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4500
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 21.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 136 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400 | 21,094+21% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 7168+65% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+54% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 224+65% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 7 MB+63% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 56+65% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 224+65% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 75% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-20% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+3% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1699 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












