
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+127.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅+127.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,649 vs 17,400).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and T1000

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

T1000
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the T1000's 7,649 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 127.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+127% | 7,649 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+386% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+782% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+82% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the T1000's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8 | 153.0+41% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Codename | AD106 | TU117 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












