
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅23.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅123.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 136).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅23.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅123.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 136).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 723 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 296 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 27,048 — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 19.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 27,048+19% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 9728+124% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+50% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 136 | 304+124% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 9.5 MB+121% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 76+124% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 304+124% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 120W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 120W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 225.4+59% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












