GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 420

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 420

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 420 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 18480.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 112303.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 12598.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 65 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.

GeForce4 MX 420

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2020 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18480.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 452920% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 65 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce4 MX 420 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 112303.5% (56.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 MX 420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 420

The GeForce4 MX 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 5 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 452920%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 MX 420 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 420). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 420). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
G3D Mark Score
22,651+452920%
5
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
Process Node
5 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
4352+386%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+584%
3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+61%
1575 MHz
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
136+113%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce4 MX 420 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce4 MX 420 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 420 carries 65 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 12598.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 420.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+12598%
0.063 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 420). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
DirectX
12.2+74%
7.0
OpenGL
4.6+207%
1.5
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (GeForce4 MX 420). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 420).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
None
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce4 MX 420's 25W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce4 MX 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 420). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
TDP
160W
25W-84%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
100mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
60°C-14%
Perf/Watt
141.6+70700%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the GeForce4 MX 420 launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 420 was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 MX 420) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 56700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 MX 420
MSRP
$399
$99-75%
Performance per Dollar
56.8+56700%
0.1
Codename
AD106
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release
May 18 2023
August 1 2020
Ranking
#59
#523

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.