GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010Core: 650 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 18324.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 242386.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18324.5% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 323485.7% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 7), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 242386.5% (56.8 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 323485.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score
22,651+323486%
7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Fermi
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
4352+1411%
288
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+2846%
0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
136+183%
48
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+1032%
0.38 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX
12.2+51%
8.1
Vulkan
1.3
None
OpenGL
4.6+254%
1.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs No.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
No
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
No
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP
160W
150W-6%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
216mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
65°C-7%
Perf/Watt
141.6
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE was 25.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP
$399
$299-25%
Performance per Dollar
56.8
0.0
Codename
AD106
GF104
Release
May 18 2023
November 15 2010
Ranking
#59
#683

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.