
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

GRID K160Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3506.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 1030% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID K160Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $274 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023GRID K160Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅+3506.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 1030% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $274 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GRID K160Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID K160Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 7 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 7 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GRID K160Q

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

GRID K160Q
GRID K160Q
The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GRID K160Q's 628 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 3506.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+3507% | 628 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+183% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+864% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+3208% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID K160Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K160Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+4957% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. The GRID K160Q costs 68.7% less ($274 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1036% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $125-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+1036% | 5.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GK104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #589 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












