GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GRID K160Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

GRID K160Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • +3506.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 1030% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $274 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 22,651).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GRID K160Q?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 628 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GRID K160Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 3506.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 219.2% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and you are getting 3506.8% higher G3D Mark. GRID K160Q really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is GRID K160Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. GRID K160Q is 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 628 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
1080p
low177 FPS28 FPS
medium162 FPS23 FPS
high142 FPS19 FPS
ultra124 FPS14 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS21 FPS
medium118 FPS17 FPS
high101 FPS14 FPS
ultra93 FPS11 FPS
4K
low93 FPS14 FPS
medium79 FPS11 FPS
high66 FPS9 FPS
ultra59 FPS7 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
1080p
low433 FPS28 FPS
medium363 FPS23 FPS
high294 FPS19 FPS
ultra240 FPS14 FPS
1440p
low278 FPS21 FPS
medium238 FPS17 FPS
high194 FPS14 FPS
ultra161 FPS11 FPS
4K
low123 FPS14 FPS
medium102 FPS11 FPS
high84 FPS9 FPS
ultra65 FPS7 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
1080p
low855 FPS28 FPS
medium693 FPS23 FPS
high609 FPS19 FPS
ultra510 FPS14 FPS
1440p
low660 FPS21 FPS
medium527 FPS17 FPS
high452 FPS14 FPS
ultra382 FPS11 FPS
4K
low447 FPS14 FPS
medium355 FPS11 FPS
high308 FPS9 FPS
ultra255 FPS7 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
1080p
low775 FPS28 FPS
medium639 FPS23 FPS
high558 FPS19 FPS
ultra492 FPS14 FPS
1440p
low613 FPS21 FPS
medium503 FPS17 FPS
high435 FPS14 FPS
ultra378 FPS11 FPS
4K
low375 FPS14 FPS
medium322 FPS11 FPS
high298 FPS9 FPS
ultra255 FPS7 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GRID K160Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GRID K160Q's 628 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 3506.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score
22,651+3507%
628
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4352+183%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+864%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
136+6%
128
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+3208%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID K160Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K160Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
TDP
160W-29%
225W
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+4957%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. The GRID K160Q costs 68.7% less ($274 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1036% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiGRID K160Q
MSRP
$399
$125-69%
Performance per Dollar
56.8+1036%
5.0
Codename
AD106
GK104
Release
May 18 2023
June 28 2013
Ranking
#59
#589