GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GRID M10-8Q
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GRID M10-8Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GRID M10-8Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GRID M10-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+772.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 5369.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID M10-8Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,595 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌526.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GRID M10-8Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GRID M10-8Q's 2,595 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 772.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+773% | 2,595 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+580% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1219% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+94% | 1306 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+240% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+1287% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID M10-8Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-8Q carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the GRID M10-8Q. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (2nd Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (4th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (2nd Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+1131% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 84% cheaper ($2101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.0 (GRID M10-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 5580% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GRID M10-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+5580% | 1.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GM107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #59 | #622 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GRID M10-8Q
