
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+286.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+286.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Intel Arc Pro A30M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A30M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 286.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+286% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+325% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+439% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+27% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+325% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A30M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A30M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+21% | 117.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | DG2-128 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












