
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+138.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,493 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅+138.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 127.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,493 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Intel Arc Pro A60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Intel Arc Pro A60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A60

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel Arc Pro A60
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 9,493 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 138.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro A60) with 136 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+139% | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+163% | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+24% | 2050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+113% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 256+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 20.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 130W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+94% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. The Intel Arc Pro A60 costs 4.8% less ($19 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 127.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $380-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+127% | 25.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | DG2-256 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












