
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Intel Arc Pro B50
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B50 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B50 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅95.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B50 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 85.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+86% | 12,208 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+107% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2600 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+113% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Intel Arc Pro B50 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro B50 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 174.4+23% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B50 was 12.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 62.3% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $349-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+62% | 35.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #221 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














