
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- β +1018% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 320.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (2,026 vs 22,651).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015Why buy it
- β +1018% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 320.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (2,026 vs 22,651).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Iris Pro Graphics P580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Pro Graphics P580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics P580

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 2,026 β the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1018%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+1018% | 2,026 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 4352+656% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1723% | 1.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+141% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+433% | 9 |
| TMUs | 136+89% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P580's 15W β a 165.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+5% | 135.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 62.4% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 13.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) β the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 320.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $150-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+321% | 13.5 |
| Codename | AD106 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #59 | #678 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












