
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- β +1048.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 58.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $344 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,972 vs 22,651).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020Why buy it
- β +1048.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 58.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $344 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,972 vs 22,651).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Iris Xe MAX Graphics?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Xe MAX Graphics still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 22 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Iris Xe MAX Graphics

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 1,972 β the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1048.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+1049% | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+771% | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+54% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 136+183% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) β the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | QuickSync |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W β a 145.9% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70Β°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 25W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+79% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics costs 86.2% less ($344 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) β the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 58.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $55-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+58% | 35.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | DG1 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #686 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












