
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+314.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1976.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅+314.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1976.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than L2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is L2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and L2

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

L2
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 314.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 92 (L2) with 136 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+314% | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 11776+171% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+169% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 136 | 368+171% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 11.5 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 96 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 92+171% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 368+171% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the L2 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 96 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the L2's 275W — a 52.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-42% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+612% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 80% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2003.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-80% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+2004% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












